Home Energy Peformance: Why Weatherization Isn’t Enough
Ask almost any building performance expert what the first step is that you should take to cut your utility bills and improve the energy efficiency of your home, and the answer will inevitably be to weatherize. And that’s as it should be. Most of our homes are rife with air leaks. According to the US Department of Energy (pdf), in the average American home 30 cents of every dollar spent on heating and cooling is lost to air leaks and insufficient insulation. That’s a lot of money to let slip–literally–through the cracks!
If you live in a drafty, underinsulated house you should no doubt focus first on weatherization. But, as important as they are, air sealing and weatherization may not be enough to ensure an environmentally and financially sustainable level of energy use. There are other increasingly important drivers of residential energy consumption that can’t be addressed by air sealing and insulating.
Since the 1970s the amount of energy that Americans use for space conditioning (heating and cooling) has fallen rather dramatically, from about 70% annually to just less than 50%. This is largely due to improvements in the efficiency of our mechanical systems as well as tighter, better insulated building envelopes.
And yet total residential consumption has remained flat over the same time period. Any guesses as to why this is? Here’s a hint: just think about all the electronic devices you have in your home now that you didn’t have 30 years ago. In the space of a generation the amount of energy we use to run our home entertainment systems, refrigerators (yup, an increasing number of us have more than 1), and other electronic gadgets has nearly doubled from 1.77 to 3.25 quadrillion Btus annually.
Now consider how much bigger the home you live in now is than the one you grew up in. It’s bigger, right? In 1950, the average US home was 1,100 square feet and the average household size was 3.4 people. Flash forward to 2009: the average new home is 2438 square feet and the average household has 2.6 people. In just two generations home size has increased by 120% and average household occupancy has dropped by 24%. Square footage per household member has tripled from 324 to 938 square feet.
Efficiency gains are just barely keeping pace with increases in consumption. Which means that for most homeowners, air sealing and insulation are simply not enough to keep energy costs in check over the long term.
We also need to pay much closer attention to plug loads, making sure that our electronics and appliances are as efficient as they can be, and asking ourselves hard questions about what we really need. Do we really need that second refrigerator? Two game systems? Fifteen recessed lights in our kitchen? When building or renovating, this would include asking hard questions about home size as well. Do we need a formal living and an informal family room? An eat-in-kitchen and a formal dining room?
Of course conservation on its own is not a realistic strategy for improving home energy performance. But, then again, neither is weatherization.
1 Comment
RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URL
cialis nekxe alternatives to viagra %-DD ghi health insurance hirw
Comment by Denver — May 9, 2012 @ 9:22 pm